.

NLP Academy Forums

   
 
.
Posted: 17 May 2010 07:05 PM   [ Ignore ]
Member
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  17-05-2010

.

[ Edited: 19 September 2014 01:14 AM by .... ]
Profile
Want to join in with this discussion? Please Login or Register.
 
Posted: 25 May 2010 10:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  88
Joined  30-03-2010

Great to hear from you Neal

I’m glad your enjoying a wide selection of our programs here at the Academy and I am looking forward to studying more with you on future courses.

Profile
Want to join in with this discussion? Please Login or Register.
 
Posted: 07 June 2010 09:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Member
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  17-05-2010

.

[ Edited: 19 September 2014 01:13 AM by .... ]
Profile
Want to join in with this discussion? Please Login or Register.
 
Posted: 04 July 2010 02:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  95
Joined  01-10-2009

Hi all

Suzie wrote

My personal preference with this exercise would be to lose any content - i.e. words that you suggest like ‘tenderness’ - and instead, let the client choose their own supportive descriptors.

I agree with Suzy here, let the client pick their own choices. I have had some amazing experiences with this exercise when the client self selects. The process is great.

Can you believe what we now call walk with X and Y originally was called walk with Grace and Power and that was in the New Code. New Code NLP was inluenced by Carlos Castenda’s books. The state of grace and power, impecability and lack of inner dialogue were major features in the books.

Grace and Power soon evolved into X and Y

Michael

Profile
Want to join in with this discussion? Please Login or Register.
 
   
 
 
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed